And Then We Danced/და ჩვენ ვიცეკვეთ (2019)

Oh no! A gay man in a chokha!

If people ask me why I’m learning Georgian, I tell them it’s a bit silly, it’s because I watched a film and fell in love. If they want to know which film, I answer with pride that it’s And Then We Danced – which has resulted in the response ‘oh, you know that’s actually quite controversial?’ as well as conspicuous silence. Often there’s a swift assertion that there are far better Georgian movies. From many, there’s a curious dismissiveness, a grumbling insistence that no one would have cared about the film if a few bigots hadn’t made such a fuss. But those bigots made quite a fuss: they harassed cinema-goers when the film was released in Tbilisi and they threw missiles, yet their hatred was a tiny taste of the hatred that Tbilisi’s small, determined Pride group faces when they try to hold a march each year, and a sliver of the horror that confronted Georgian rights activists in 2013 – an event that inspired Levan Akin to do the research that led to this film.

It’s legal to be gay in Georgia and it’s illegal to discriminate against someone on the basis of their sexuality – it’s a protected characteristic in laws designed to butter up EU allies, but trying to get someone convicted of and punished for a hate crime against queer people in Georgia seems to be next to impossible. Insecure gangs of men, worried that their cushy patriarchal, church-backed lifestyle will be disrupted, and spouting well-worn global Anti-semitic conspiracy theories, feed into precisely the narrative the Kremlin would love to see dominate in Georgia, even while maintaining that their fear and hatred is an act of patriotism.

So the dismissiveness makes me more determined to make it clear that I’m only interested in learning the language because of what this film did. Ignoring the hate groups behind the disruption at the premier isn’t enough to change things, it’s not enough to win protections for people who are still denied their human rights and prevented from living their lives to the full in their home country. And Then We Danced set out to raise awareness of the situation for queer people in Georgia and it set out to ruffle the plumage of those who think compromise is needed: those who would say, ‘it’s fine, it’s legal, what more do you want? Don’t rub your lifestyle in others’ faces, don’t flaunt it, don’t give the youth ideas!’ It does this by presenting an achingly relatable, warm story of young love and heartbreak, a coming-of-age story about realising your hopes and realising how fragile they are, where love of your country and its traditions is pitted against a narrow idea of what fits the national, correct narrative. It’s a warning, to my mind: lose people like Merab Lominadze from your country and its traditions at your peril. You’ll be all the lesser without such passion and creativity, and without innovation, tradition will become stale, without the youth, what is the future of the place you claim to be protecting?

Admittedly, a lot of these strong feelings have kind of bedded in since I saw the film. It took a little time to filter through my consciousness as I researched what I could about the country and the making of the film. Initial impressions were led far more by emotions and by the visuals and soundtrack of the movie, and by the stunning debut performance of Levan Gelbakhiani in the lead role.

And Then We Danced tells the story of a young man in an ensemble at the Georgian National Ballet, who dreams of dancing on stages around the world, just as his parents and grandparents did. Merab works hard, though his form is criticised by teachers and relatives alike, and he ends up reassessing his priorities after a whirlwind love affair with a new dancer, his rival at the ensemble, Irakli. Family, tradition and passion come into conflict as Merab finds out how much more complicated his dreams are than he’d always supposed.

Filmed under unpredictable, often hostile conditions, with locations denied to the crew at the last minute and ambivalence from the government’s ministry of culture, it’s a wonder to see what a coherent, subtle, beautifully produced film Levan Akin was able to put together on his tiny budget. The orange light of the sun and of Georgian street lamps unites the whole thing, bathing the film in an inviting, soft glow, and the carefully curated soundtrack – much of which consists of rerecorded Georgian folk songs arranged anew because previous performers refused to be associated with the film – soothes and invigorates as needed, amplifying the emotions of the narrative. A centrepiece is the unaccompanied, powerful polyphonic ballad Tsintsqaro (Before the Wellspring), which sits bracketed by ABBA and Robyn – Levan Akin makes sure his Swedish heritage is not neglected – undercutting the repeated message that Georgian masculinity is about strength and hiding emotion. These songs say that love is love and heartache is heartache, and Georgian men have traditionally been proud to display their emotions through art.

Ironically, the dancer who the film references when Merab is told that Georgian dance used to be softer and more suited to the way he moves, but that it was changed to be more masculine, was gay himself – though Georgians are quite happy to compartmentalise this aspect of their hero Vakhtang Chabukiani’s life. There’s no room for sex in Georgian dance, as the instructor tells his class at the film’s outset.

It’s a message that’s wasted on his young class though – that’s all they can talk about in the changing rooms, the guys swapping filthy jokes and tales of brothels and the girls gossiping about a gay scandal. Irakli, the new dancer, sidles into this setting with a cheeky smile, a prohibited earring, and a habit of talking back to the teacher. Naturally, everyone wants to get the measure of this new guy and his interests – he won’t go to the brothels because he has a girlfriend back home, but he’s curious about taking one of the girls in the ensemble out to dinner. And for all his apparent rebelliousness, he seems awfully concerned that Merab shouldn’t be mad at him when he gets swapped into the duet Merab had been practising with his lifelong dance partner and presumed girlfriend, Mary.

So much has been said, quite rightly, about Levan Gelbakhiani’s performance as Merab – he’s absolutely integral to the power of the film. The camera clings to him throughout, following close at his back, getting up in his face in scenes of high emotion, adoringly framing his dances and the blossoming of love on his features. As Merab, he’s an open book, vulnerable and fiercely determined all at once – for all that people see weakness in Merab’s dances, there’s a stubborn core in the character that is left bare by the end of the film. He ends up being more of a rebel than Irakli could be. Gelbakhiani’s background in contemporary dance gives him the experience of channelling emotions into body language, and means that Merab’s loose, graceful style of dance really stands out as something unique – if not what the traditionalists want. Gelbakhiani can pull your heartstrings with nothing more than  the tightening of the muscles on his back, with a grin brought swiftly under control – or not – with any look from his mutable, striking features. He gives the film a winning hero, who you simply have to root for, who will remind anyone who’s been in love of the force of that emotion and the relentlessness of it.

Bachi Valishvili deserves more recognition for his part as Irakli, too. It’s a harder role to win praise for, his perspective is distant from the audience’s, his motivations are kept private and often seem contradictory. He’s a harder character for audiences to love because of the choice he makes in the end, though it might be said that the real tragedy of the film lies in Irakli’s future. Valishvili plays him with subtlety, as an inscrutable cool guy who swings between fun-loving openness and silent, reserved introspection. He has to tread a fine line to persuade viewers that, while he remains more concerned by others’ opinions and by family loyalties, Irakli is nevertheless as enthusiastic a participant in the affair as Merab is. And he must also make us believe that Irakli is the naturally better dancer – when Valishvili’s training was a matter of months before the film, as opposed to Gelbakhiani’s years of dance. He succeeds in this with the help of clever techniques – cunning camera angles, a focus on others’ reactions to his dance – and narrative generosity – such as when Irakli is too hungover to practise hard. But he gives the character all the charm he needs for us to believe that Merab would be smitten, and he injects a sweetness and a vulnerability into Irakli’s expressions as we – and Merab – are left to wonder whether he regrets what he’s done and which of his words were true.

The whole cast is a wonder, really. The naturalistic dialogue and the light-touch of the director’s hand leaves the actors to sell the strength of the relationships – Ana Javakhishvili as Merab’s partner, Mary, does so much with the slightest widening of her eyes or the tightening of her mouth. Her heartbreak is as real and vivid as Merab’s, though it must happen in comparatively private moments, muddied by fear and misunderstanding.

The film glides along, timescale and details left impressionistic as it builds to a crescendo at a vineyard in the countryside. In the last third things begin to fall apart for Merab, and the film mirrors the sudden aimlessness of his life as, without warning, one thing and then another goes wrong. Between the heartache, the film gets in its plug for Tbilisi’s defiant queer scene: cameos from activists and local characters make the film inclusive, reinforcing the fact that it’s not just founded on the impressions of a Georgian who lives in Sweden, but involved people who live in Tbilisi and directly face the attitudes Merab and Irakli must hide from. When, at last, Merab is told – out of love – that there’s no place for him in Georgia and he must find a way to leave, the sense of community that radiates from the club scenes is what must stand against this pragmatic, frustrating advice.

I am glad that the film does not wrap up the issue of whether Merab stays or goes. Evidently life becomes untenable for some, such as the dancer Zaza, whose scandalous downfall is gossiped about through the film, but Mate, who takes Merab to the safe havens of Success Bar and the legendary club Bassiani, shows the other side of the coin. As Matt Shally, the actor playing Mate, has said in this short about his life in drag and the queer art scene in Tbilisi, Comfort Zone (2020), Georgia is his home, he shouldn’t be expected to leave because of who he is. The advice Merab gets to leave comes, after all, from his older brother – who proves he does care for him and says all Merab needs to hear about his dance – but whose opinions can certainly not be taken uncritically to be in line with the film’s own intentions.

As well as telling a very familiar story of youth, whirlwind romance and obsession, And Then We Danced not only makes this part of its story feel as fresh and impassioned as every young love affair is to those involved – you can’t be cynical about how Merab feels, the beats of his emotions are sold so convincingly, shown in their earnestness but never patronised – but it also evokes a very palpable love for the setting and its traditions. Food, music, dance, family are all crucial to the atmosphere of the film. The pointlessness of stoking conflict between these elements is really emphasised by the amount of love the characters – and certainly the director – holds for all these aspects of life in Georgia, while also saying simply, that queer people should be allowed to love these things too.

Today is International Day Against Homophobia, Transphobia and Biphobia. In Georgia, since 2013, it has also been the ‘Day of Family Purity’. The religious bigots who stoked violence against a tiny, peaceful group of people then have never faced any consequences – the church is untouchable. In And Then We Danced the traditional idea of the nuclear family is shown to be in tatters, an institution that isn’t fit for purpose, adherence to which does not make anyone happy – and this is a portrayal that is echoed by many other contemporary Georgian films. Merab’s parents have separated, Mary’s parents have separated, David and Sopo – carefree, cavalier, irresponsible kids – must marry to save her family’s ‘honour’, and while Irakli’s loyalty to his mother and his dying father may be laudable, it also looks like martyrdom. Nevertheless, there is huge love between Merab and his parents, and Mary and her father. These are families finding their own ways of surviving and being happy, and the toxic idea of ‘family purity’ does them no more good than it does Merab and his ilk. But more of that when we get to My Happy Family/ჩემი ბედნიერი ოჯახი. Note, also, that Patriarch Ilya II’s Easter speech this year came across almost as a parody for how closely it echoes the priest’s words in And Then We Danced, stoking vague fears of international influences and the loss of patriarchal roles.

There’s no great conspiracy here though, nothing complicated or sinister. It’s just about love, and answering hate and fear and misunderstanding with love. And no one who watches it could mistake that for weakness. This film changed me, it invited me to fall in love with the country too, despite the struggles and the attitudes that still need to change. There is such hope in the young generations involved in this film, and I will cheer them on as loudly as I can until change comes.

The Rise/Revenge/Return of ienthuse!

It’s been a while – what made me decide to try and start maintaining this blog again?

Could it have been all that extra lockdown free time?

Not exactly, you’ll find out soon enough what I did with that period (threat).

The news we’re getting a Fisherman’s Friends 2?

Delighted as I am for another opportunity to ogle James Purefoy in knitwear, it wasn’t that.

Maybe some thrilling new development emerging from one of Disney’s many tentacles?

Nah – enthusiasm or no, it’s somewhat embarrassing to see this blog has been languishing with my cheerful take on Endgame on the front page. I re-read that post in a state of bemusement recently – I don’t think I’ve once spent more than two seconds thinking about that film since then. I hear Wandavision is good – I’ll try to stir myself to watch it some time. But Thor: Love and Thunder is really the only forthcoming Marvel title I’m interested in, and as for Star Wars… how can the same person who wrote thousands of words justifying her enjoyment of the spectacle of The Last Jedi not have made a single post about The Rise of Skywalker? It’s not so different from my experience with the prequels, really – from enthusiastic defence of The Phantom Menace, even as I knew I didn’t believe my own arguments, to not even bothering to see Revenge of the Sith for years after its release.

Sometimes I notice how hollow the enthusiasm rings a few days/months/years after the event. Usually means I’m ready for a cultural reset and need some time off the blockbusters.

If that sounds a bit pretentious, don’t worry – I’ve barely got started.

What’s led me back here is all my overflowing thoughts about some of the films I’ve been watching recently and a curiosity to see if I can articulate what interests me in them and what patterns I’ve been seeing. This has been about as far from the Hollywood blockbuster scene as imaginable – I’m talking arthouse cinema from the Caucasus, baby.

However, I still like to keep a record still of what media I’ve been consuming – influences, interests, annoyances, whatever. It probably won’t be an exhaustive list – there’s bound to be stuff I’ve forgotten watching or reading since 2019, and some things I probably have no opinions on.

  • But here’s a summary of the rest of 2019, as I remember it.
  • Books that I read in 2020 (I was not a voracious pandemic reader, as you will see) [still in draft].
  • Cinema and other pre-lockdown activities in 2020. [still in draft]


Or, if you prefer, there’s a list of titles, linked to the posts concerning them, see below.


As for the rest of 2020/2021 so far:
So much of what I’ve been reading, watching and listening to over the past year is a direct result of seeing one film – a film I heard of by chance from a blog that doesn’t post often these days, that I was probably only able to watch because it couldn’t get a cinema release due to the pandemic, and was available from Curzon Home Cinema. I rented it on March 30 last year and watched it every day for the three days I had it – uncertain fascination turning rapidly into the decision to let myself fall hard in love. It’s not a perfect film, but it’s astonishing given the circumstances under which it was made, and it is an important film, though easily and unfairly lumped in with other ‘gay coming of age’ cinema. It’s also a gateway drug to the Georgian language, which has been my lockdown hobby (along with the sourdough and the gardening, the hair-dying and the new dog).

Here’s my review of And Then We Danced/და ჩვენ ვიცეკვეთ, and the film features in my other posts on Georgian cinema here, here and here [still in draft]. As well as leading me to watch movies from Georgia and about Georgia, it encouraged me to watch more global cinema [still in draft] and more queer cinema [still in draft]. Though I do still, occasionally, watch less heavy or obscure stuff – that’s gathered in a post here [still in draft].

2019
Mr President (book)
Embassytown (book)
Wreck-It Ralph 2 (film)
Ready or Not (cinema)
Knives Out (cinema)
Rise of Skywalker (cinema)

2020
Ipswich players panto
Gorky Park (book)
Booksmart (film)
Vikingdom (film)
Under the Pendulum Sun (book)
To Calais, In Ordinary Time (book)
The Diaries of Frannie Langton (book)
Kiki’s Delivery Service (film)
King Arthur (film)
Conversations With Friends (book)
The Reavers (book)
Kate Butch (live)
The Murder in the Red Barn (theatre)
1917 (cinema)
David Copperfield (cinema)
And Then We Danced/და ჩვენ ვიცეკვეთ (film)
Portrait de la jeune fille en feu (cinema)
Sam Lee (live)
The Lighthouse (cinema)
The Captive Prince and Prince’s Gambit (books)
Shubh Mangal Zyada Saavdhan (film)
Ek Ladhi Ko Dekha Toh Aisa Laga (film)
Two queer Indian shorts (films)
A Girl Walks Home Alone at Night (film)
Anna Karenina (film)
Frozen 2 (film)
Chess of the Wind (film)
Wolkwalkers (film)
Monanieba/მონანიევბა [Repentance] (film)

Dancing in Odessa (book)
The Tradition (book)

Six Georgian Poets (book)
Tomorrow Never Dies (film)

The Literature Express (book)
Me var Beso/მე ვარ ბესო [I am Beso] (film)
Chemi Bednieri Ojakhi/ჩემი ბედნიერი ოჯახი [My Happy family] (film)
The Man Who Surprised Everyone (film)
In Bloom/გრძელი ნათელი დღეები (film)

March For Dignity (film)
No (film)
The Pear Tree (book)

Casablanca (film)
Singin’ in the Rain (film)
The Sound of Music (film)
Ghori/ღორი [Pig] (film)

Marilivit tetri/მარილივით თეთრი [Salt White] (film)
2021
Post Mortem (film)
Dasatsqisi/დასაწყისი [Beginning] (film)
Ashik Kerib (film)
The Colour of Pomegranates (film)
Udzinarta Mze/უძინართა მზე [Sun of the Sleepless] (film)
Magdana’s Donkey/მაგდანას ლურჯა (film)
I Wish Summer Would Never Come Again/ნეტავ აღარასოდეს მოვიდეს ზაფხული (film)
The Plank (film)
Natvris xe/ნატვრის ხე [The Wishing Tree] (film)

April/აპრილი (film)

April/აპრილი (1961)

Black and white still from the film April, the young couple sit on the floor of an otherwise empty apartment.

I wonder if Eula Bliss has seen this near-dialogue-free Soviet-era Georgian short?  In Having and Being Had (a book I am admittedly yet to read), Bliss takes as her starting point the purchase of her house: “In 2014 she bought her first house, with her husband John. This should have made her happy; instead it made her uncomfortable in a way that she couldn’t describe.” (source) From the reviews and excerpts I have read, her concerns are given particular focus by the issue of furniture, its maintenance and longevity, its design and creation. Furniture is also at the heart of this unsubtle, cheeky little warning against the march of consumerism and, presumably, Western ideals of living.

A young couple wanders the streets of Tbilisi – they tease each other, they fall out, they make up. They search, endlessly, for a quiet place to share a kiss. Privacy is all they ask for. Meanwhile, those around them seem unconcerned with such things: the residents of an old building fling open the windows of their rooms and deliberately eschew privacy in favour of communal vivacity; playing music from their windows, watching the world while doing weights, practising ballet to the sounds of the musicians all around. This cheerful racket is only matched by the clatter of a gang of devious removal men (furniture sellers? Their actual jobs are unclear. They port furniture from place to place – loudly).

All the furniture goes out of the building and a new building appears, square and squat and regular. The locals move in and happily fling open the square, regular windows and carry on as they were. The young couple finds an empty apartment and finally they get to enjoy the privacy they sought, now with electricity, gas and running water! They have nothing else in the apartment and they are quite content with one another. Downstairs, one of the noisy furniture men moves his stock in and goes about from keyhole to keyhole, searching for customers. Having shown the young people the potential on offer – a life in old age, solemnly polishing the glassware together – and been rebuffed, he resorts to leaving a chair in their apartment. The chair sits like a dark stain in the bright, empty rooms, but its influence is immediate: item by item, the couple now buys into the life of consumerism.

Now that they have things, they must get locks on their door to protect the things. One thing begets another; outfits must change; plants in vases need water; furniture needs polishing; and why open a window when you can buy a fan? As the women in the building wave their dusters out of the windows, the musicians retreat indoors, their instruments coated in dust, the sounds of electrical equipment drowning them out. The man exercising at his window turns away from it and the ballet dancer gives up, unable to concentrate. The film’s scant dialogue bubbles up as the couple argue – earlier they spoke softly, inaudibly, when all they had to compete with was the music around them. Now all they can do is yell at one another – even the furniture man notices, and is surprised that their things have not made them happy.

Things break, and the couple struggle to connect as they move awkwardly around the crowded rooms. Happily, the usual Georgian reluctance to gather the narrative into an ending, or to articulate a clear message, is absent from this little film. With a clamour of noise, the couple fling their troublesome furniture from the window to the street. The musicians begin to play in joyful response, the ballet dancer resumes her practise and the weightlifter turns back to the window with a smile. The couple go to their window, they throw it open and beam at their happy neighbours. The furniture man and his friends shake their heads over the mess on the street, uncomprehending.

Up on the pasture, where the couple used to go to kiss before they found their apartment, there is a reminder that despite this about-turn in their priorities, the damage cannot entirely be undone: the tree they used to kiss beneath is gone, chopped down to make the furniture they demanded more and more of. It may not be subtle, but აპრილი [April] is a charming little comedy in the vein of works like The Plank (forgive me, my references for this time of film are still limited), summarising a place and a time with a few deftly drawn characters and locations. It is playful and romantic – the lights are kept on and the water is kept running by the strength of the couple’s love for one another – and you won’t be able to help smiling along with the musicians when they catch their opportunities to play in the moonlit night. The use of sound, particularly the squeaky shoes of the furniture man, disturbing the peace wherever he goes, is ingenious, and it’s all very beautiful to look at. Didn’t do much for my Georgian listening practise, but it was a delight.

The first quarter of 2019

movies1.png

What have I been doing? How on earth are we at the end of March already? Well, I may have been reading slowly, but this is because you can’t read and knit, and I’ve been nurturing an addiction to knitting that has necessitated the creation of another blog (Girl, get your gansey! — in which I try to continue knitting at the rate of one jumper a month for a year. Look, it’s the only thing keeping me sane with the headlines these days).

I’ve seen a few good movies though, watched a lot of rugby and TV, and made it to some good exhibitions. This post is a summary of what I got up to so far this year.

To be truly honest, not much has made as much of an impact on me as the three seasons of Monty Don’s gardens: French, Italian and Japanese. It’s perfect documentary TV, enhanced by nestling under a blanket on a grey winter’s morning, dreaming of sun and blossom and light. He’s a knowledgeable, enthusiastic host, unable to repress his joy at every garden he enters. The history of the great and good ties his narratives together (from kings’ mistresses to would-be popes), alongside smaller insights (the invention of the secateurs and their effect on our idea of what plants should look like). He’s a gentle, twinkly-eyed presenter, an utterly trustworthy guide, and the arc of the series is tied to decades of his life: he relives his bohemian student days in France and then reflects on a recent, serious illness in the zen gardens of Japan. It’s enormously soothing if you like watching thoughtful people encounter nature, art and human creativity. Or if you just want to learn how to appreciate a good hedge.

With that in mind, the films I’ve watched have had stiff competition. Which fared best? Probably the first I saw…

I watched

Can you ever forgive me? (cinema)

Melissa McCarthy gets her Kathy Bates on, while Richard E. Grant gives us a more joyous, flamboyant version of an aging Withnail. As cozy, ugly and uncomfortable as a beige sweater vest, but still warm. It’s hard to be churlish about the cat dying and the gay man getting AIDs when it’s based on real lives: what, in fiction, might be trite or forced is here just as sudden and unfair as in life. There are great performances and really dark humour — earlier versions of the cast would have made it a completely different movie, but I think McCarthy and Grant made it something special. You’ll cringe, but god you’ll root for Lee Israel, and her defensive lashing out will frustrate you as much as it does the few people who might be called her friends — she’s excellent at making her own pain and problems. She finds all the ease and warmth she can’t manage in reality when she adopts the personas of famous authors in her faked letters, more Dorothy than Dorothy indeed. Oh, and the passing swipe at Tom Clancy is glorious, too.

Maxïmo Park – As Long as We Keep Moving (2019)

My old favourites recorded a live DVD to see off keyboardist Lukas Wooller, who has since moved to the other side of the world (I hope he’ll meet up with Chris Chinchilla and form a supergroup). It’s a short and sweet set list played in a country church, run through kaleidoscopic filters that make it more of an ambient art piece than the attempt to capture the full live experience of 2008’s Found on Film. The list reflects all six of their albums, plus b-sides, which is quite a feat, but the tracks sit well next to one another, and this is a set list designed to get you dancing. I still don’t think Girls Who Play Guitars works without an audience, but other than that, the energy builds to the accustomed high point of Limassol, before gently guiding you to the close with Books from Boxes (proving its worth by getting stuck in my head whenever I even glance at the DVD title). It hits the expected notes and is very much for the fans: the long-time supporters will see reflections of the old 2004 video for The Coast is Always Changing in the neon-tinted monochrome shots of Paul Smith at the mic — though he’s more the showman now, arms spread in the church doorway, a hint of summer’s heat shining into the church from behind him. It’s a nice thing for die-hard fans, though I’m not sure of its wider appeal. The songs sound great though, and if you enjoyed watching old Microsoft screensavers you’ll have a grand time spacing out to this, too.

Moana (rewatch)

I’ve reached this point where animated films just…get under my skin in a way live action doesn’t. Give me a wall of song, wistful but hopeful, a young girl determined to prove herself, the bittersweet memory of a loved one lost and the mysterious motivation provided by knowledge one’s past combined with a thrill for the future, and, well, it rains on my face. What’s that about? Still, it seems only to work in the dark of the cinema, where there’s no hiding from it. At home, I can simply enjoy How Far I’ll Go and We Know the Way as the toe-tapping, lung-busting pop tunes they are. Even with Disney life’s crappy app, this is a beautiful film, and a firm favourite of mine alongside Brave. Love that eco-concious ending, love the dynamic between our heroine and the trickster god, love Alan Tudyk’s work as the stupid chicken and Jermaine Clement’s terrifying crab.

In Time (2011)

This was… weirdly compelling, but also Not Very Good. It was an interesting mutation of Logan’s Run, but not one that bears close examination, and the characters felt poorly fleshed out, as though they rested on assumptions the film never had time to explain. The cast of careworn ‘twenty-five year olds’ included Olivia Wilde and Cillian Murphy — beautiful people to be sure, but not quite eternally youthful. Still, I enjoyed its earnestness, and the game efforts of Murphy and the leads, Justin Timberlake and Amanda Seyfrid. Their Bonnie and Clyde style rampage, implausible as it might all be, was satisfying good fun, even if Murphy’s end was a huge anticlimax. It felt like it wanted to be part of a bigger franchise, and it’s probably a good thing it didn’t get to be. But that misplaced ambition remains to contribute to the film’s odd charm.

101 Dalmatians (rewatch)

The 1961 animated version of course! I kept seeing appreciation posts and figured I’d remind myself of Disney’s earlier output. It’s a cozy classic, its outdated gender norms far enough from the fore to allow a modern viewer to relax and enjoy the beautiful animation. Full of plucky British spirit in the face of hardship, full of good natured, easy going helpfulness, it trots by easily. The exception is the long, snowy journey back to London, which drags a little, but still looks gorgeous.

The Guernsey Literary and Potato Peel Pie Society (2018)

Gosh Lily James is just so darn likeable! She has lit up every role I’ve seen her in, and she’s perfect here as the dissatisfied biographer looking for her next weighty subject. On the surface her character is doing well: success and money from a comedy persona she writes as, a well-to-do American fiancé, and the care of her kindly, brotherly agent. Beneath it all, the war still affects her though: the loss of her parents and their home during the Blitz, and the long years of dereliction and staleness in the city. She’s ready for an adventure in a wild part of the country, a return to simpler things and a regaining of perspective. Cue a chance letter from the island of Guernsey, asking for help in sourcing a book. The British do fish out of water, city-dweller visits the sticks stories pretty solidly. We’ve had a lot of practice. Sure, they’re often saccharine or a little patronising, but when the formula works it’s a rich, warming treat. This is one where the formula works very well, carried by a compelling cast of characters, and most of all by James’ performance. She avoids the patronising naïveté that can so easily spoil these things, not letting the story the islanders are holding onto go, while respecting the emotion surrounding it. My only unease was with the flashbacks: it felt like some detail got lost in the transfer to film, where we had to take it on trust that this man was ‘different’ from his comrades without ever finding out what made him different. It was eminently watchable though. The kind of thing you would always be happy to tune into on a weekend afternoon and watch again. [edited 28 April because I always confuse my Lilys…]

Captain Marvel (cinema)

Further. Higher. Faster. Better! I know I’m not meant to pit heroine against heroine, but I did prefer this to Wonder Woman. The uneasy buddy dynamic between young Nick Fury and Carol Danvers was delightful, especially with that ’90s soundtrack. No male love interest, not even hinted at, and an unapologetically kick-ass finale that made me think of Commando: “throw away that chicken-shit gun.” Unlike Arnie’s nemesis, Carol isn’t stupid, and has nothing to prove. Seeing that offer of a ‘fair fight’ slide right off her like the proverbial water off a duck’s back was one of the most satisfying moments I’ve had in the cinema for a while. Sure, as a whole it’s a by-the-books superhero outing — it is never not predictable — Jude Law? Actually evil? Animatedkirk.gif And it’s got a lot to cram in so that it fits within the overarching steamroller of the MCU’s designs, whereas it might have been a more interesting film given more time to do its own thing. But it gave us a bit more Djimon Hounsou as Korath, it gave us a sweetly affecting performance from Ben Mendelssohn, and it gave us the glorious Rambeaus. I think I like it about the same as I like the first Captain America: it’s solid and easy to watch, even if it isn’t challenging in any way.

Fisherman’s Friends (cinema)

Some things really make you notice when you’ve got older. I don’t normally pay much heed to the number on my birthday cards, but I remember the ‘oh’ moment the first time I filled in a survey and found myself outside the 18-24 category. Watching Fisherman’s Friends was a little like that. The girl who fell in love with the Black Prince of A Knight’s Tale has grown old enough to see James Purefoy play the father of the ingenue, not the romantic lead. And to be honest, I quite like it: it’s a better look for him these days than whatever was going on with Olga Kurylenko in Momentum (which I haven’t managed to bring myself to watch). And he was honestly quite good in the role of dour Cornishman Jim, ringleader of the singing fishermen: he was a genuine presence, a mixture of slouchy, surly mistrust and the proud, charismatic performer. That work on Hap and Leonard has given him new depth. Of course, why bother denying that I went to this purely for Purefoy? I was still by far the youngest in a lairy grey-haired crowd, and the film was the standard fish-out-of-water, Londoner learns the value of community story. But it was likeable enough, I laughed in the intended places, and the music was almost as good as the jumpers. It didn’t have the originality of Guernsey‘s plucky female protagonist, nor the heartfelt, righteous feeling of Pride, but we do these movies so often here in the UK and we’ve got the formula down pretty solid. Nothing new or surprising here, but it’s a comfortably easy watch nonetheless.

I read

The Ballad of Reading Gaol and other works (Oscar Wilde)

Like Keats, a love of beauty and its transience, but rages with more bitter loneliness (as you’d expect), uniting Melancholy and the philosopher who would clip the angel’s wings or unpick the rainbow to find a darker theology: each man kills the thing he loves. It’s not a belief I share, and pity for the man who murdered his wife is hard to summon. Pity for the man about to be executed is another matter, and it’s startling and painful all over again to see it through Wilde’s eyes and to imagine the aesthete stripped of his velvets and silks, coated with the grey dust of labour and murmuring his horror at what he experiences. Some of his struggles with religion in the prose poems are harder for me to identify with, and though the observation of nature in the Garden of Eros has its moments of transcendental beauty, the framing is more Keatsian than I can stand. But then he just hits you with one of those perfect lines: ‘Ambition, love and all the thoughts that burn’.

Morning double-bill: The Red Turtle and Stockholm, My Love

These quiet, highly individualistic films might not be everyone’s cup of tea for a back-to-back viewing, but I found the combination surprisingly soothing for a morning of knitting and recovery.

The Red Turtle (2016)

I had not fully appreciated what this film was about before I put it on. ‘Something something, the turtle represets his mother’, was what I expected, I think. Not so. Not at all. Rather, this can be seen as some kind of beautiful blend of a selkie story and fairy enchantment tales, all but free of dialogue, in a timeless and dreamlike setting. Less surprisingly, it is as gorgeously illustrated as any animated movie can be. The sailor we meet at the opening, dwarfed by the squall, has already lost his boat and all trappings that might identify an era for the setting or a homeland for the man (ok, he hallucinantes a string quartet in eighteenth century clothes later, but it didn’t change the anonymity of the overall atmosphere). He is anonymously brown-skinned, with Hergé dot eyes rather than the usual overly-expressive anime eyes of Ghibli. Marooned on an uninhabited island, we follow the usual trials and tribulations of such a man: finding food and water, avoiding accidents and devising a way off the island. It’s when he tries to leave that things get a little odd: something does not want him to get far beyond the sand bar off the island’s coast, and his raft is destroyed whenever he tries to leave. The force keeping him there turns out to be a huge red turtle, who follows him up to the island when he swims, once more, to land. Our sympathetic sailor, who just wants to live, now can’t resist the human impulse to vengeance, and turns on his jailer, flipping the turtle on its back and leaving it to bake in the sun. Instead of jumping on a new raft and leaving, the guilt of it begins to get into him though, and he stays mournfully by the body until one day it turns into a woman with long red hair. Is this a story about man’s violence against nature, the need to tame things and take possession of them? Eh, maybe, or maybe it’s just selkies but with turtles. As a mediation on life and death, growing up and surviving, it’s a beautiful thing to watch, but it doesn’t escape the power structures rooted in the folk tales it parallels, and the fact that the sailor has to kill the turtle to reveal the woman stopped me from really loving it as much as I wanted to.

Stockholm, My Love (2016)

Neneh Cherry wanders the streets of the Swedish capital with a monologue about shame, fear and happiness. A slow, introspective film in three parts, it follows her character, an architect, as she wrestles with a trauma experienced a year before. In English she talks to her father about her shame, second-guessing his thoughts; in Swedish she speaks to a person involved in the trauma that hounds her; finally she just looks and listens, text occasionally floating onto the screen as she talks to the city itself, coming to terms with what happened. It’s an introspective study of grief, subtly and beautifully acted, and relatable for anyone who has wandered around looking for solace in the details of life and the way the light interacts with their surroundings, finding peace in the line of a shadow on a street or the curve of a building. Is it somewhat pretentious? Sure, but there’s nothing wrong with that. When happiness reared its head on a riverside roller-coaster as a traditional Swedish ballad played out, I laughed along with the narrator. She finds no simple answers, but catharsis in being in a place she loves and in looking closely at it — “what was I looking at? It doesn’t matter. I was looking”, she tells the city. The city goes on, and her dislocation is healed by a short, sharp shock to the system, but she still carries her fear and shame: she’s just now learned to look at them, too.

Review: The Favourite (cinema)

No doubt predictably, I loved this well enough to write a separate review for it. I’ve been looking forward to it since about halfway through last year when I first heard of it: the cast! The setting! The director! What on earth would Yorgos Lanthimos come up with this time?

A really great period drama of course, an exploration of power and love with a sad core barely hidden by the belly laughs. Like the other film by Lanthimos I’ve seen (The Lobster), many of its funniest moments turned out to be in the trailer, but The Favourite had more depth to it, and far more heart than try-hard kookiness (I did like The Lobster! It was just a bit hollow in the end). It also looked stunning, the lonely, claustrophobic court atmosphere enhanced by the use of fish-eye lenses that distorted things but also brought to mind security footage and ever-present observation. Credit where credit is due, it works in a large part because of the humanity of Deborah Davis and Tony MacNamara’s script, tethered to Lanthimos’ whimsical directorial style by the cunning and inventive cinematography of Robbie Ryan.

It’s savage, beautiful stuff. Should love have its limits? Lady Sarah thinks so, when it comes to people, but not when it comes to one’s country; Queen Anne thinks not, but then again, love of the monarch and love of the country ought to be a blurred line, right? But The Favourite emphasises Anne as a person, affected by the demands and isolation of monarchy, powerful but trapped. She’s a timid thing at the beginning, sickly and held under Lady Sarah’s competent thumb (that bondage suit riding gear!), her position as monarch only enough to keep her caged and doubtful while Lady Sarah runs affairs her way. There is love there, for sure, but over-reliance, too, and cruelty.

Enter Abigail: down on her luck, cast out of good society, and from the very first time we see her, it’s apparent that people use her just how they like. The Favourite plays these moments for laughs, yes, but not just that. The man wanking in the carriage is funny because Emma Stone’s horrified expression is a thing of wonder, because when he pinches her arse she gets a slapstick fall in the mud — but the disbelieving disgust is real, too, and again and again she is honest about the brutality of her life: the rapes, the assaults, the utter lack of freedom. Still, she proves her worth with her knowledge of folk medicine, and her cousin Sarah allows her into the fold — she also, with all the hubris of a tragic hero, needles Abigail for her naïveté and initiates a contest in which, as Sarah comes to realise too late, they are fighting for different things.

Lady Sarah fights for love, Abigail for freedom. Between them, the Queen learns confidence in her abilities and decisions, and Sarah’s love goes unrecognised and Abigail learns that no matter how high she rises in that society, she cannot be free. She has to sell herself again and again: the handjob on her wedding night, the final shot on her knees before the queen. Contrasted with Lady Sarah’s unmolested recovery at the brothel, Abigail’s ruthless sacrifices seem futile next to her cousin’s assured pride in her position. And despite her pride and cruelty, Sarah’s love is genuine — for Queen and for country — while Abigail cares only about herself. This is what makes it easier for Anne to dominate her, perhaps, in the way she could not with Sarah.

They’re all three of them awful and sympathetic in their own ways, at their own times, and it’s a fantastic balancing act to make sure the audience roots for each woman in turn as the power dynamics slip and slide between them. It’s really just a delight to see court intrigue played out between three such individual, well-rounded female characters, each portrayed by an actress at the peak of her game. The weirdness of the past and the royal court are not skimped, from duck-racing to casual sessions of pelting a naked man with rotten fruit, from the dancing to the clothes. It doesn’t matter that the details don’t always try to be accurate, or that the story is not a scrupulously perfect retelling of historical events. The atmosphere is recognisably strange, but the emotions are recognisably human. My favourite combination.

January film diary: Cinderella, Into the Woods and Emma

Cinderella (2015)

Delightful! I remember nothing of the animated Cinderella, but was pleasantly surprised to learn they had discovered some scene-setting detail and plot in this. Everyone was utterly charming, Cate Blanchett was having far too much fun, and instead of seeming simple and naïve, Lily James’ Ella was the perfect balance of sweet optimism and determined pluck. Good escapism all round: sure, it’s fairytale feudalism, but it’s a little more self-aware than usual.

Into the Woods (2014)

Disappointing, perhaps more so after my enjoyment of Cinderella‘s unpretentious kindness. More Hollywood than the previous Hollywood takes on fairytales: a mean, shallow story that thinks its lack of happily ever afters and lack of a ‘message’ make it somehow worthy of an overwhelming smugness. It thinks it’s terribly clever for running with the idea that ~transformations~ occur in forests, in folklore and fairytale. But its transformations are thin and unconvincing. No. Sorry. Bad.

Emma (1996)

I saw this once a long time ago, and it remains very good, but though I feared its stunning cast might threaten my favourite Austen adaptation, it’s not quite the BBC Emma with Romola Garai. Plus despite the excellence of Paltrow, Northam and Cummings in their roles, not all of it works: much as I love Polly Walker, I never quite got used to her as sweet little wallflower Jane Fairfax, and Ewan MacGregor’s hair is a travesty. Still, it makes a fair fist of condensing the story into a very watchable film without appearing to lose much detail, though the early part drags a little. My complaints are more about what this does not do that the BBC series does, so it wouldn’t be fair to go on: it’s an adequate adaptation, perfectly charming. But it doesn’t grasp the insecurities and small-town fears that make the book my favourite Austen novel.

Playing catch up…

Still clinging on here, still reading, still intending to keep writing! I was just too busy reading to write the reviews up, sorry guv. Also travelling, working, the usual.

It probably is time to admit that I’m not going to try to review everything here any more (not that I ever bothered for TV anyway, I needed to keep something for just switching off…). I’ve not been to the cinema so much this year, now I’m not a member of the local one and I work longer hours. I guess there’s also been less that I’ve really wanted to see. Anyway, from now on the reviews I write for films here will be of the same selective nature as those I write for albums, so that I know I have something to say. At the bottom of this post, for uh, the completists I guess, there is a list of things I watched since my last post and a brief note of my feelings. None of them really inspired me to say anything more, so the subject of this blog is henceforth largely sticking to books and live music/theatre.

Inspiration more recently has been coming from satisfying TV (I’ve been enjoying The Good Place, Bojack Horseman, The Americans, The Terror and Utopia), but I’m still not tempted to start doing recaps or reviews for that. Life is too short (and we already spend so much time waiting for things to be over).

So I present a small collection of belated reviews of the books I’ve been reading. I hope someone enjoys them. If you do, then thanks very much for taking the time to read them.

Wow it doesn’t normally take me a whole month to read a book I promise… I managed to get through all of last Christmas’ acquisitions this year, and have a few new and recent purchases I’d like to get to before the end of 2018 (some Ursula K. Le Guin for one, and possibly Svetlana Alexeivitch). I’m currently on Goldman’s The Princess Bride, as it seemed a fitting time to finally pick it up, and a reread of my favourite, Wuthering Heights, is long overdue. I’ve also got a few live events in the diary which should be varied and fun to write up.

—————————————————————————–

Ghostbusters (2016)
Fun, but a bit thin. I’m sick of the ramped up stakes in the action movie ending: a smaller villainy would have left it more time to be braver about its gender politics.

Ant-man and the Wasp (cinema)
This ending was great though! Hand-wavy magic science and everyone staying alive (ignoring Infinity War for now)! Huw from Detectorists and his truth serum! Functional divorced parenting! I love this bit of the MCU, even if Hope got a bit squeezed out of her own film and sometimes the tone was trying a bit too hard to recreate Edgar Wright’s energy.

This is Spinal Tap (1984)
I don’t know how it took me so long to finally see this! Of course, I knew pretty much all of the iconic lines already, but it was great to see them in context at last. I couldn’t stop thinking about the tiny bread as I went from holiday breakfast buffet to holiday breakfast buffet afterwards.

Persuasion (1995)
Ah, the Jane Austen story where Nothing Happens. Great cast, but wow is it ever stagey, right down the bizarre carnival pageant behind the happy couple as they walk home. I’m afraid that even with its cast I prefer the more recent adaptation from ITV.

The Death of Stalin (rewatch)
I enjoyed this even more the second time by only half paying attention, so that I could just enjoy the funny lines without overthinking the bleakness of the historical context…

Disney’s Robin Hood (rewatch)
Still the best music, though let’s not look too closely at the class politics and the accents (advice that applies to all Robin Hood adaptations). Feels a bit baggy in the middle, but it holds up well.

Lilo and Stitch (rewatch)
Still great. That is all.

Big Hero 6 (2014)
Predictable but fun. It looked good but I never really got invested in the characters.

Zootopia (2016)
I’d looked forward to this for a while, but it wasn’t quite as bold as I’d hoped. I did prefer it to BH6, but it didn’t stay with me afterwards like the classics do.

Short review: The Eagle Huntress (2016)

There has been some controversy over the way this story is told. Otto Bell, the director, clearly wants to sell a neat story of female empowerment, and no doubt some subtlety has been lost in his efforts. An academic has thoroughly debunked the claims that Aisholpan is the first female eagle huntress in Kazakh tradition, but even if the film wants to push its message a bit far, other reviewers’ complaints of staging feel churlish, and one suspects that these critics quietly agree with the naysayers Bell films tut-tutting about a woman’s place. Aisholpan is still a young girl who wants to hunt with eagles, and as such is in the minority. There are no other contemporary huntresses shown at the competition she attends, and her skill and determination are very real. So is the bond between her and her father, who delights in supporting her from the hair-raising scramble down a sheer cliff face she must perform in order to capture a wild eaglet, to helping her navigate the snow drifts when they take their eagles hunting in the wild mountains. The film is full of beautifully observed details: I was struck by the pastel purple chipped nail polish on Aisholpan’s fingers as she wrangled her eaglet from her nest and into a cloth bag. She’s still a schoolkid, she’s just a schoolkid who was determined to raise and train her own giant, feathered killing machine. She’s a compelling heroine too, with a brave face for all situations. The story is unapologetically feel good — I know it was blatant and unsubtle editorialising but I still laughed and laughed at the old men with faces like slapped arses when we cut to them after the competition — but Aisholpan herself has defended the essential narrative and her achievements should stand, regardless.